From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: phrdina@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dietmar@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 3/8] qmp: add internal snapshot support in qmp_transaction
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E904B2.8060702@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130718122226.GJ3582@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
于 2013-7-18 20:22, Kevin Wolf 写道:
> Am 11.07.2013 um 07:46 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
>> Unlike savevm, the qmp_transaction interface will not generate
>> snapshot name automatically, saving trouble to return information
>> of the new created snapshot.
>>
>> Although qcow2 support storing multiple snapshots with same name
>> but different ID, here it will fail when an snapshot with that name
>> already exist before the operation. Format such as rbd do not support
>> ID at all, and in most case, it means trouble to user when he faces
>> multiple snapshots with same name, so ban that case. Request with
>> empty name will be rejected.
>>
>> Snapshot ID can't be specified in this interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> blockdev.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> qapi-schema.json | 18 ++++++++-
>> qmp-commands.hx | 34 ++++++++++++----
>> 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
>> index b3a57e0..6554768 100644
>> --- a/blockdev.c
>> +++ b/blockdev.c
>> @@ -808,6 +808,118 @@ struct BlkTransactionState {
>> QSIMPLEQ_ENTRY(BlkTransactionState) entry;
>> };
>>
>> +/* internal snapshot private data */
>> +typedef struct InternalSnapshotState {
>> + BlkTransactionState common;
>> + BlockDriverState *bs;
>> + QEMUSnapshotInfo sn;
>> +} InternalSnapshotState;
>> +
>> +static void internal_snapshot_prepare(BlkTransactionState *common,
>> + Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + const char *device;
>> + const char *name;
>> + BlockDriverState *bs;
>> + QEMUSnapshotInfo sn, *sn1;
>> + bool ret;
>> + qemu_timeval tv;
>> + BlockdevSnapshotInternal *internal;
>> + InternalSnapshotState *state;
>> + int ret1;
>> +
>> + g_assert(common->action->kind ==
>> + TRANSACTION_ACTION_KIND_BLOCKDEV_SNAPSHOT_INTERNAL_SYNC);
>> + internal = common->action->blockdev_snapshot_internal_sync;
>> + state = DO_UPCAST(InternalSnapshotState, common, common);
>> +
>> + /* 1. parse input */
>> + device = internal->device;
>> + name = internal->name;
>> +
>> + /* 2. check for validation */
>> + bs = bdrv_find(device);
>> + if (!bs) {
>> + error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND, device);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!bdrv_is_inserted(bs)) {
>> + error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_HAS_NO_MEDIUM, device);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (bdrv_is_read_only(bs)) {
>> + error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_IS_READ_ONLY, device);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!bdrv_can_snapshot(bs)) {
>> + error_set(errp, QERR_BLOCK_FORMAT_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED,
>> + bs->drv->format_name, device, "internal snapshot");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!strlen(name)) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Name is empty on device '%s'", device);
>
> Name is empty. This has nothing to do with the device.
>
OK.
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* check whether a snapshot with name exist */
>> + ret = bdrv_snapshot_find_by_id_and_name(bs, NULL, name, &sn, errp);
>> + if (error_is_set(errp)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + if (ret) {
>
> Save one line with '} else if {' ?
>
will change, thanks.
>> + error_setg(errp,
>> + "Snapshot with name '%s' already exists on device '%s'",
>> + name, device);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* 3. take the snapshot */
>> + sn1 = &state->sn;
>
> do_savevm() has a memset() to clear all of sn1 before it starts filling
> it in. Should we do the same here? For example sn1.vm_state_size looks
> undefined.
>
I think state->sn is set to zero by
qmp_transaction():
state = g_malloc0(ops->instance_size);
> It also stops the VM before saving the snapshot. I don't think this is
> necessary here because we don't save the VM state, but do we need at
> least the bdrv_flush/bdrv_drain_all part of it?
>
bdrv_drain_all() is called already in qmp_transaction(). But I plan
add an explicit API later for bdrv_flush/bdrv_drain, which ensure data
is going to underlining storage.
>> + pstrcpy(sn1->name, sizeof(sn1->name), name);
>> + qemu_gettimeofday(&tv);
>> + sn1->date_sec = tv.tv_sec;
>> + sn1->date_nsec = tv.tv_usec * 1000;
>> + sn1->vm_clock_nsec = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock);
>> +
>> + ret1 = bdrv_snapshot_create(bs, sn1);
>> + if (ret1 < 0) {
>> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret1,
>> + "Failed to create snapshot '%s' on device '%s'",
>> + name, device);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* 4. succeed, mark a snapshot is created */
>> + state->bs = bs;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void internal_snapshot_abort(BlkTransactionState *common)
>> +{
>> + InternalSnapshotState *state =
>> + DO_UPCAST(InternalSnapshotState, common, common);
>> + BlockDriverState *bs = state->bs;
>> + QEMUSnapshotInfo *sn = &state->sn;
>> + Error *local_error = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (!bs) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (bdrv_snapshot_delete(bs, sn->id_str, sn->name, &local_error) < 0) {
>> + error_report("Failed to delete snapshot with id '%s' and name '%s' on "
>> + "device '%s' in abort, reason is: '%s'",
>> + sn->id_str,
>> + sn->name,
>> + bdrv_get_device_name(bs),
>> + error_get_pretty(local_error));
>> + error_free(local_error);
>
> See, here you're doing the right thing if bdrv_snapshot_delete() returns
> simple errors like "Failed to remove from snapshot list". With the
> changes the earlier patch made to qcow2, you end up with this, though:
>
> Failed to delete snapshot with id 'uninitialised' and name 'test' on
> device 'ide0-hd0' in abort, reason is: 'Failed to remove snapshot
> with ID 'uninitialised' and name 'test' from the snapshot list on
> device 'ide0-hd0''
>
> We need to standardise on the minimal error information that makes the
> error unambiguous in order to avoid such duplication.
>
> To sum up: Leave this code as it is, but change qcow2 etc. to remove ID,
> name and device from their messages.
>
OK, will remove them in the implementions.
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Kevin
>
--
Best Regards
Wenchao Xia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-19 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 5:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 0/8] add internal snapshot support at block device level Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 1/8] snapshot: new function bdrv_snapshot_find_by_id_and_name() Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 2/8] snapshot: distinguish id and name in snapshot delete Wenchao Xia
2013-07-18 11:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-07-19 9:12 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-07-18 11:48 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-19 9:13 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 3/8] qmp: add internal snapshot support in qmp_transaction Wenchao Xia
2013-07-18 12:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-19 9:19 ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2013-07-19 10:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-20 0:09 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 4/8] qmp: add interface blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 5/8] qmp: add interface blockdev-snapshot-delete-internal-sync Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 6/8] hmp: add interface hmp_snapshot_blkdev_internal Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 7/8] hmp: add interface hmp_snapshot_delete_blkdev_internal Wenchao Xia
2013-07-11 5:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 8/8] qemu-iotests: add 056 internal snapshot for block device test case Wenchao Xia
2013-07-18 11:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 0/8] add internal snapshot support at block device level Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-07-18 12:34 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-19 5:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E904B2.8060702@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=phrdina@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).