From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0G0v-0000t3-Qu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:06:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0G0t-000759-7x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:06:49 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]:58879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0G0t-00074t-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:06:47 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so2549913qcz.0 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <51E98E42.9060102@twiddle.net> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:06:42 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130719132852.27732500@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130719132852.27732500@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 23326164ae (exec: Support 64-bit op...) triggers assertion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel On 07/19/2013 10:28 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > Hi, > > Reproducer: > > # ./qemu-qmp -drive file=disks/test.img,if=virtio,cache=none,aio=native \ > -enable-kvm -m 1G -monitor stdio -usb -usbdevice host:1.43 > QEMU 1.5.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information > (qemu) qemu-qmp: /home/lcapitulino/work/src/upstream/qmp-unstable/exec.c:1927: memory_access_size: Assertion `l >= access_size_min' failed. > > I have an USB stick on 1.43, although I did manage to get this without > USB at all (forgot how, though). > > Bisect says the bug was introduced by: > > commit 23326164ae6fe8d94b7eff123e03f97ca6978d33 > Author: Richard Henderson > Date: Mon Jul 8 14:55:59 2013 -0700 > > exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw > Yes, we've already discussed it and agreed upon a solution. I guess it hasn't been applied yet? r~