From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] spapr-vscsi: add task management
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:23:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ECFA12.20200@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ECD190.60700@redhat.com>
On 07/22/2013 04:30 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/07/2013 03:04, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto:
>> The free_request callback
>> is not directly "linked" to task management though it happens to only
>> be called in that case. It's a pre-requisite to task management, make it
>> a separate patch.
>
> Ben is right, in fact I'm not sure why you need free_request at all
> (since vscsi_put_req is called from both vscsi_command_complete and
> vscsi_request_cancelled).
>
> free_request is only needed by hw/usb/dev-uas.c because it does
> scsi_req_ref/scsi_req_unref in the HBA code. There is no need for this,
> AFAIK, in the current spapr_vscsi code; if it is done in the
> reorganization patches, the free_request callback should be added there.
Hmmm. It looks like you're right :-/ I am just not very familiar with this
stuff yet so some misunderstanding is expected :)
For now I cannot find really good testing sequence. I do some delay hacks
in various places but I am not sure I am testing what I want to test as
"req->enqueued" is always false when I debug task management.
--
Alexey
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-21 10:04 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] spapr-vscsi: add task management Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-07-21 21:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-21 23:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-22 6:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-07-22 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-07-22 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-22 0:57 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-07-22 1:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-22 6:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-22 6:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-22 9:23 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ECFA12.20200@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).