From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1ygi-0005Ub-Ks for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:01:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1yge-00058d-1Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:01:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1ygd-00058Z-Ma for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:00:59 -0400 Message-ID: <51EFD002.4040406@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:00:50 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130724060104.GA18072@redhat.com> <51EF7BDF.2070503@redhat.com> <20130724095116.GB26778@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130724095116.GB26778@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pc: limit 64 bit hole to 2G by default List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Anthony Liguori , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Isaku Yamahata , Alex Williamson , Paolo Bonzini , Laszlo Ersek , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , David Gibson On 07/24/13 11:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:01:51AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> On 07/24/13 08:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> It turns out that some 32 bit windows guests crash >>> if 64 bit PCI hole size is >2G. >> >> Ah, *that* is the reason for winxp crashing with a 64bit hole. >> >> Current seabios uses a slightly different approach: the 64bit hole is >> present only in case it is actually used to map bars there, and seabios >> tries to fit everything into the 32bit hole first. > > Yes. But this doesn't work with device hotplug. Sure. This wasn't meant as request to match current seabios behavior. Just wanted provide some additional background info. > I intend to send a patch to properties that allows writing > "size=1G" instead. > Will this address your comment? Sounds good. cheers, Gerd