qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Giuseppe Lettieri <g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it>,
	Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] e1000: add interrupt mitigation support
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:14:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F28436.5050607@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+_eA9h=3APdR-n81RPdQ3PF2zWrjRnaCQvTpEL_Keu3JqY6XA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 26.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Vincenzo Maffione:
> 2013/7/26 Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>:
>> Am 26.07.2013 12:14, schrieb Vincenzo Maffione:
>>>   I tried to support cross-version migration using version_id and
>>> VMState subsections.
>>
>> The point of using a subsection is to avoid incrementing version_id AFAIU.
> 
> Consider a migration from an older QEMU version to a newer one.
> AFAIU, the e1000_post_load() callback is passed "1" or "2" into the
> "version_id" parameter (i.e. the e1000 version of the older QEMU).
> If that is correct, in this scenario I have to zero-init the new
> fields I implemented, otherwise they would stay uninitialized.

The whole state struct is always zero-initialized as part of
object_new()/qdev_create(). So only non-zero fields need to be
initialized, and I assume that a zero flag will indicate no mitigation
feature.

> If I don't increment version_id to 3, how can I understand when we are
> in this scenario?
> 
> Or maybe I should assume that (in the same scenario) the new version
> QEMU instance MUST have been launched with the mitigation disabled? If
> I assume this it seems to me that incrementing version_id to 3 is not
> necessary.

You can assume that you have equivalent command lines on both source and
destination. -M pc-i440fx-1.5 and -M pc-q35-1.5 would simply never
receive your subsection. I'm sure Stefan can explain in more detail.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-26 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-26 10:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] e1000: add interrupt mitigation support Vincenzo Maffione
2013-07-26 12:05 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-26 13:09   ` Vincenzo Maffione
2013-07-26 14:14     ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-07-26 14:17       ` Vincenzo Maffione

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51F28436.5050607@suse.de \
    --to=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rizzo@iet.unipi.it \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=v.maffione@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).