From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Giuseppe Lettieri <g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it>,
Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] e1000: add interrupt mitigation support
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:14:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F28436.5050607@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+_eA9h=3APdR-n81RPdQ3PF2zWrjRnaCQvTpEL_Keu3JqY6XA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 26.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Vincenzo Maffione:
> 2013/7/26 Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>:
>> Am 26.07.2013 12:14, schrieb Vincenzo Maffione:
>>> I tried to support cross-version migration using version_id and
>>> VMState subsections.
>>
>> The point of using a subsection is to avoid incrementing version_id AFAIU.
>
> Consider a migration from an older QEMU version to a newer one.
> AFAIU, the e1000_post_load() callback is passed "1" or "2" into the
> "version_id" parameter (i.e. the e1000 version of the older QEMU).
> If that is correct, in this scenario I have to zero-init the new
> fields I implemented, otherwise they would stay uninitialized.
The whole state struct is always zero-initialized as part of
object_new()/qdev_create(). So only non-zero fields need to be
initialized, and I assume that a zero flag will indicate no mitigation
feature.
> If I don't increment version_id to 3, how can I understand when we are
> in this scenario?
>
> Or maybe I should assume that (in the same scenario) the new version
> QEMU instance MUST have been launched with the mitigation disabled? If
> I assume this it seems to me that incrementing version_id to 3 is not
> necessary.
You can assume that you have equivalent command lines on both source and
destination. -M pc-i440fx-1.5 and -M pc-q35-1.5 would simply never
receive your subsection. I'm sure Stefan can explain in more detail.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 10:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] e1000: add interrupt mitigation support Vincenzo Maffione
2013-07-26 12:05 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-26 13:09 ` Vincenzo Maffione
2013-07-26 14:14 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-07-26 14:17 ` Vincenzo Maffione
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F28436.5050607@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rizzo@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=v.maffione@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).