qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: pmoore@redhat.com, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 0/2] seccomp: remove unused syscalls - for 1.6
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:44:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F2DF92.4030704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EE341F.7040108@redhat.com>

Any chance to get it pushed for 1.6? Thanks.

On 07/23/2013 04:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/07/2013 20:33, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto:
>> In this small patch series I basically:
>>
>>    v3 update:
>>    - reincluded getrlimit(), it's used by Xen.
>>
>>    v2 update:
>>    - set libseccomp 2.1.0 as requirement on configure script.
>>    - reincluded setrlimit() (used by Xen) and removed sendfile64() from
>>      the whitelist.
>>
>>    1) Remove the ifdef's for the (not so) new libseccomp version that does a
>>    best effort and translates x86_32 syscalls into x86_64 when possible.
>>
>>    2) Remove unused syscalls on the seccomp whitelist. For that removal, I've been
>>    running several instances of Qemu using a script written on top of
>>    virt-test[0]. After some weeks testing I could come up with this small list,
>>    and safely remove them without breaking anything.
>>
>> [0] - https://github.com/autotest/virt-test/wiki
>>
>> Eduardo Otubo (2):
>>    seccomp: no need to check arch in syscall whitelist
>>    seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist
>>
>>   configure      |  2 +-
>>   qemu-seccomp.c | 17 -----------------
>>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Paolo
>

-- 
Eduardo Otubo
IBM Linux Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-26 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-22 18:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 0/2] seccomp: remove unused syscalls - for 1.6 Eduardo Otubo
2013-07-22 18:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 1/2] seccomp: no need to check arch in syscall whitelist Eduardo Otubo
2013-07-22 18:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist Eduardo Otubo
2013-07-23  7:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 0/2] seccomp: remove unused syscalls - for 1.6 Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-26 20:44   ` Eduardo Otubo [this message]
2013-07-29 20:24 ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51F2DF92.4030704@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).