From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3k0g-0004wF-NS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:45:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3k0a-0004x6-Jz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:44:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3k0a-0004ww-CO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:44:52 -0400 Message-ID: <51F63A21.6000903@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:47:13 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1374527256-27631-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1374527256-27631-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] OptsVisitor: support / flatten integer ranges for repeating options List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , Paolo Bonzini , Wanlong Gao On 07/22/13 23:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > rfc->v1: > - addressed Paolo's comments for patches 1 and 2, > - patches 7 and 8 are new (unit tests), > - updated the cover letter to take native lists into account, plus > cleaned it up. Will this be considered for 1.7? I'm not sure how Wanlong's NUMA stuff is scheduled, but I think it shouldn't wait for my series' acceptance. (Rebasing -numa range parsing to rely on the new OptsVisitor "capability" shouldn't be hard -- it's mostly removing "client" code.) Thanks Laszlo