From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3lD6-0006Ag-5r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:01:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3lD0-0003ye-7U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:01:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3lD0-0003yX-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:01:46 -0400 Message-ID: <51F64B76.5060900@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:01:10 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1374527256-27631-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> <51F63A21.6000903@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51F63A21.6000903@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] OptsVisitor: support / flatten integer ranges for repeating options List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wanlong Gao Il 29/07/2013 11:47, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: > On 07/22/13 23:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> rfc->v1: >> - addressed Paolo's comments for patches 1 and 2, >> - patches 7 and 8 are new (unit tests), >> - updated the cover letter to take native lists into account, plus >> cleaned it up. > > Will this be considered for 1.7? Yes, why not? :) Paolo > I'm not sure how Wanlong's NUMA stuff is scheduled, but I think it > shouldn't wait for my series' acceptance. (Rebasing -numa range parsing > to rely on the new OptsVisitor "capability" shouldn't be hard -- it's > mostly removing "client" code.) > > Thanks > Laszlo >