From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3no3-0000A7-1h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:48:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3nnv-0007GE-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:48:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3nnv-0007G3-B3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:48:03 -0400 Message-ID: <51F6727A.8090102@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:47:38 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1374762197-7261-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1374762197-7261-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20130729131344.GD10467@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130729131344.GD10467@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/19] block: update bs->total_sectors on writes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: pl@kamp.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com Il 29/07/2013 15:13, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: > Am 25.07.2013 um 16:23 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> If a BlockDriverState is growable, after every write we need to >> check if bs->total_sectors might have changed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >> --- >> block.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c >> index 6cd39fa..ebac2fa 100644 >> --- a/block.c >> +++ b/block.c >> @@ -2651,6 +2651,9 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, >> if (bs->wr_highest_sector < sector_num + nb_sectors - 1) { >> bs->wr_highest_sector = sector_num + nb_sectors - 1; >> } >> + if (bs->growable && ret >= 0) { >> + bs->total_sectors = MAX(bs->total_sectors, sector_num + nb_sectors); >> + } > > Can we change bdrv_getlength() to use bs->total_sectors even for > growable images after this patch? Probably, but not in 1.6. :) Paolo