From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 3/5] timer: make qemu_clock_enable sync between disable and timer's cb
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:17:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F78491.708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnKYQmznzjHUFRb_BbDN+3p9KtaS0G6c_RNrgPFetRpk6431w@mail.gmail.com>
Il 30/07/2013 04:42, liu ping fan ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Il 29/07/2013 10:10, liu ping fan ha scritto:
>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Il 29/07/2013 05:16, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
>>>>> After disabling the QemuClock, we should make sure that no QemuTimers
>>>>> are still in flight. To implement that, the caller of disabling will
>>>>> wait until the last user's exit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note, the callers of qemu_clock_enable() should be sync by themselves,
>>>>> not protected by this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is an interesting approach.
>>>>
>>>>> - if (!clock->enabled)
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> + atomic_inc(&clock->using);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(!clock->enabled)) {
>>>>> + goto exit;
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> This can return directly, it doesn't need to increment and decrement
>>>> clock->using.
>>>>
>>> Here is a race condition like the following
>>
>> Ah, I see.
>>
>> Still this seems a bit backwards. Most of the time you will have no one
>> on the wait_using condvar, but you are almost always signaling the
>> condvar (should be broadcast BTW)...
>>
> I have tried to filter out the normal case by
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&clock->lock);
> + if (atomic_fetch_dec(&clock->using) == 1) { ---------> 1st place
> + if (unlikely(!clock->enabled)) { -------> 2nd place
> + qemu_cond_signal(&clock->wait_using);
> + }
> + }
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&clock->lock);
>
> Could I do it better?
Hmm, do we even need clock->using at this point? For example:
qemu_clock_enable()
{
clock->enabled = enabled;
...
if (!enabled) {
/* If another thread is within qemu_run_timers,
* wait for it to finish.
*/
qemu_event_wait(&clock->callbacks_done_event);
}
}
qemu_run_timers()
{
qemu_event_reset(&clock->callbacks_done_event);
if (!clock->enabled) {
goto out;
}
...
out:
qemu_event_set(&eclock->callbacks_done_event);
}
In the fast path this only does two atomic operations (an OR for reset,
and XCHG for set).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 3:16 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/5] arm AioContext with its own timer stuff Liu Ping Fan
2013-07-29 3:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 1/5] timer: protect timers_state with lock Liu Ping Fan
2013-07-29 6:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 8:01 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-29 3:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 2/5] timer: pick out timer list info from QemuClock Liu Ping Fan
2013-07-29 3:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 3/5] timer: make qemu_clock_enable sync between disable and timer's cb Liu Ping Fan
2013-07-29 6:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 8:10 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-29 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-30 2:42 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-30 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-07-30 9:51 ` Alex Bligh
2013-07-30 10:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 5:54 ` liu ping fan
2013-08-01 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 9:35 ` Alex Bligh
2013-08-01 12:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 13:28 ` Alex Bligh
2013-08-01 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 14:20 ` Alex Bligh
2013-08-01 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-02 3:31 ` liu ping fan
2013-08-02 10:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-02 3:33 ` liu ping fan
2013-08-02 14:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-05 2:13 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-29 3:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 4/5] timer: associate three timerlists with AioContext Liu Ping Fan
2013-07-29 6:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 8:20 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-29 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-30 2:35 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-29 3:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 5/5] timer: run timers on aio_poll Liu Ping Fan
2013-07-29 9:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/5] arm AioContext with its own timer stuff Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-07-29 10:23 ` Alex Bligh
2013-07-29 13:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-07-29 13:56 ` Alex Bligh
2013-07-30 3:35 ` liu ping fan
2013-07-29 10:18 ` Alex Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F78491.708@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).