From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] net/tap.c: Possibly a way to stall tap input
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:45:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FBA9FE.9050505@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130802114652.GA342@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
On 2013-08-02 13:46, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:15:54PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> I was digging into the involved code and found something fishy:
>>
>> net/tap.c:
>> static void tap_send(void *opaque)
>> {
>> ...
>> size = qemu_send_packet_async(&s->nc, buf, size,
>> tap_send_completed);
>> if (size == 0) {
>> tap_read_poll(s, false);
>> }
>>
>> So, if tap_send is registered for the mainloop polling (ie. can_receive
>> returned true before starting to poll) but qemu_send_packet_async
>> returns 0 now as qemu_can_send_packet/can_receive happens to report
>> false in the meantime, we will disable read polling. If also write
>> polling is off, the fd will be completely removed from the iohandler
>> list. But even if write polling remains on, I wonder what should bring
>> read polling back?
>
> This behavior seems fine to me. Once the peer (pcnet) is able to
> receive again it must flush the queue, this will re-enable
> tap_read_poll().
>
> Can you explain a bit more why this would be a problem?
The problem is that I don't see at all what will call tap_read_poll(s,
1), neither in theory nor in reality.
As long as the real test case is out of reach, I tried to emulate the
faulty behaviour by letting tap_can_send always return 1. Result:
reception stalls during boot as even qemu_flush_queued_packets cannot
get it running again once tap_read_poll(s, 0) was called.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-01 17:15 [Qemu-devel] net/tap.c: Possibly a way to stall tap input Jan Kiszka
2013-08-01 17:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 7:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-02 7:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 11:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-02 12:45 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-08-02 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 19:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-05 11:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51FBA9FE.9050505@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).