From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] net/tap.c: Possibly a way to stall tap input
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 21:41:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FC0B64.9080700@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FBA9FE.9050505@siemens.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2140 bytes --]
On 2013-08-02 14:45, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-08-02 13:46, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:15:54PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> I was digging into the involved code and found something fishy:
>>>
>>> net/tap.c:
>>> static void tap_send(void *opaque)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> size = qemu_send_packet_async(&s->nc, buf, size,
>>> tap_send_completed);
>>> if (size == 0) {
>>> tap_read_poll(s, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> So, if tap_send is registered for the mainloop polling (ie. can_receive
>>> returned true before starting to poll) but qemu_send_packet_async
>>> returns 0 now as qemu_can_send_packet/can_receive happens to report
>>> false in the meantime, we will disable read polling. If also write
>>> polling is off, the fd will be completely removed from the iohandler
>>> list. But even if write polling remains on, I wonder what should bring
>>> read polling back?
>>
>> This behavior seems fine to me. Once the peer (pcnet) is able to
>> receive again it must flush the queue, this will re-enable
>> tap_read_poll().
>>
>> Can you explain a bit more why this would be a problem?
>
> The problem is that I don't see at all what will call tap_read_poll(s,
> 1), neither in theory nor in reality.
>
> As long as the real test case is out of reach, I tried to emulate the
> faulty behaviour by letting tap_can_send always return 1. Result:
> reception stalls during boot as even qemu_flush_queued_packets cannot
> get it running again once tap_read_poll(s, 0) was called.
OK, false alarm. The issue was most likely fixed by commit 199ee608
(net: fix qemu_flush_queued_packets() in presence of a hub) which is
present in 1.5.x but not 1.3.x. We initially tried to test on 1.5 but
had to role back to 1.3 due to other issues - and missed this fix.
My understanding of the networking maze was confused by the unfortunate
naming of the incoming net client queues ("send_queue") - will propose a
renaming.
This still requires a confirmation on the target, but I'm quite
optimistic now.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-01 17:15 [Qemu-devel] net/tap.c: Possibly a way to stall tap input Jan Kiszka
2013-08-01 17:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 7:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-02 7:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 11:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-02 12:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-02 19:41 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-08-05 11:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51FC0B64.9080700@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).