From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67393C43461 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB4C206D4 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:15:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2FB4C206D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58866 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE8kh-0001DH-9v for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:15:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE8jv-0000gz-2I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:14:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:60258 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE8js-0002kI-CN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:14:38 -0400 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-249-WQ1PcuwTPlSkc1Q_HJD-tA-1; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:14:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WQ1PcuwTPlSkc1Q_HJD-tA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13661007293; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-112-159.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.159]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071760FC2; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] iotests: Remove 030 from the auto group To: Kevin Wolf References: <20200904055701.462482-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20200904082513.GA6237@linux.fritz.box> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <51e03521-f0b7-bf29-1ab8-9025f2f4ce94@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:14:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200904082513.GA6237@linux.fritz.box> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/04 03:58:24 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.403, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 04/09/2020 10.25, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 04.09.2020 um 07:57 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: >> Test 030 is still occasionally failing in the CI ... so for the >> time being, let's disable it in the "auto" group. We can add it >> back once it got more stable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > > I would rather just disable this one test function as 030 is a pretty > important one that tends to catch bugs. Ok, ... should it always get disabled, or shall we try to come up with some magic checks so that it only gets disabled in the CI pipelines (... though I don't have a clue how to check for Peter's merge test environment...)? Thomas