From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7Mdn-0007x6-13 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:36:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7Mdf-0005S0-Iv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:36:18 -0400 Received: from mail6.webfaction.com ([74.55.86.74]:42705 helo=smtp.webfaction.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7Mdf-0005Rl-En for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:36:11 -0400 Message-ID: <5203668A.4020001@ctshepherd.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:36:10 +0100 From: Charlie Shepherd MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1375728247-1306-1-git-send-email-charlie@ctshepherd.com> <20130806093753.GH3117@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> <5202F2CE.60602@ctshepherd.com> <20130808071553.GB3119@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130808071553.GB3119@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: [PATCH 0/5] Explicitly annotating coroutine_fn functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, gabriel@kerneis.info, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@gmail.com On 08/08/2013 08:15, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 08.08.2013 um 03:22 hat Charlie Shepherd geschrieben: >> On 06/08/2013 10:37, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> >>> Against which tree is this? It didn't apply on top of qemu-git master, >>> nor on my block branch. >> Sorry, just to clarify, this isn't based on QEMU but is a repository >> containing the CPC tool, which can then be used to statically check >> QEMU; you'll need to clone it into its own repo. In this example it >> should be a sibling directory to whichever QEMU checkout you're >> testing it on. > Sorry, the quoted cover letter text was probably more confusing than > helpful. I meant what qemu tree your patch series is against. Ah, that would make more sense. It's based on 1acd5a3, which is just where master was when I started the patch series a few weeks ago. It probably makes sense to base it on a more sensible start point, is there one you'd prefer? Maybe v1.6.0-rc0? Charlie