From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46391)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1V7TUi-0005st-3M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:55:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1V7TUQ-00051j-LZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:55:24 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51210 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1V7TUQ-0004yP-G1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:55:06 -0400
Message-ID: <5203CD66.1050200@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:55:02 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <51FCBF4E.90605@web.de> <51FCBFD2.3030401@web.de>
	<CAFEAcA8wfnXaZkHh_qpJbm5SzfNgthNdWS_g8N5VSHWp_0RW4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5203CB50.5090306@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA9TQWeWy0JKrbhAT8XU8WLm+cpuyV65hrfGTwh=Uaq4Lg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9TQWeWy0JKrbhAT8XU8WLm+cpuyV65hrfGTwh=Uaq4Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Revert "memory: Return -1 again on
 reads from unsigned regions"
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Am 08.08.2013 18:48, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 8 August 2013 17:46, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Since no one has spoken up with a concrete use case that breaks when
>> having the PIO region opaque, I agree this seems the best solution we
>> have for 1.6. But given the musicpal issue you have raised, I would as=
k
>> Paolo or Jan to squash these two patches together to avoid a git-bisec=
t
>> regression.
>=20
> Not sure what you have in mind here -- musicpal is an ARM
> board, and no ARM system should ever touch the system_io
> region at all, so for musicpal patch 1/2 has no effect
> and we care only about 2/2.

Sorry, mixed up your other reply with this non-threaded series - thought
you were saying 1/2 introduced the regression, but the regression is
already in qemu.git I understand just like for prep.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg