From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44978)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1V7nfc-0006K8-1X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:28:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1V7nfW-000587-2y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:27:59 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26644)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1V7nfV-00057z-Nu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:27:54 -0400
Message-ID: <5204FC40.1060303@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:27:12 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1375998147-24292-1-git-send-email-alex@alex.org.uk>
	<20130809094158.GF22210@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
	<48C9BC85-C9E2-404E-9063-69CECAEDEE3A@alex.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <48C9BC85-C9E2-404E-9063-69CECAEDEE3A@alex.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv8 00/30] aio / timers: Add AioContext
 timers and use ppoll
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>, rth@twiddle.net

Il 09/08/2013 16:19, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
> Stefan,
> 
> On 9 Aug 2013, at 10:41, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> 
>> Patch 29/30 didn't make it to my inbox.  It may have been bounced due to
>> size.  Using your git repo instead.
> 
> I can break this up into 1 patch per file if you prefer, which is
> what I was originally going to do. The automated program does that
> and produces git comments. That's about 130 commits I think. Would
> you prefer that?

No, 130 patches is too much I think.  Just post a git tree, we'll get
this in via a pull request if need be.

Paolo