qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Ping Fan Liu <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Convert AioContext to Gsource sub classes
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 10:03:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5205F3CA.1060009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5205B251.2060907@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Il 10/08/2013 05:24, Wenchao Xia ha scritto:
> Hi folks,
>   I'd like form a series which remove AioContext's concept and
> bind to glib's main loop more closely. Since changed place will be
> a bit much so want to know your opinion before real coding:

I'm not sure I understand...  What does it buy you to split AioContext
this way?  First, BhSource and FdSource are needed by block drivers, and
BhSource needs the notifier to interrupt the main loop.  Second,
AioContext is _already_ a GSource exactly to integrate closely with
GLib's main loop.  Look at the series that introduced AioContext back in
October 2012.  The main AioContext is already added as a GSource to the
iothread's main loop; aio_wait is used in dataplane for simplicity, but
it could also use a separate GMainLoop and add AioContext there as a
GSource.

Paolo

> changes:
> **before patch:
> typedef struct AioContext {
>     GSource source;
>     int walking_handlers;
>     QemuMutex bh_lock;
>     struct QEMUBH *first_bh;
>     int walking_bh;
>     EventNotifier notifier;
>     GArray *pollfds;
>     struct ThreadPool *thread_pool;
> } AioContext;
> 
> **After patch:
> typedef struct BhSource {
>     GSource source;
>     QemuMutex bh_lock;
>     struct QEMUBH *first_bh;
>     int walking_bh;
> } BhSource;
> 
> typedef struct FdSource {
>     GSource source;
>     int walking_handlers;
>     EventNotifier notifier;
>     GArray *pollfds;
>     struct ThreadPool *thread_pool;
> } FdSource;
> 
> Benefits:
>   Original code have a mix of Gsource and GMainContext's concept, we
> may want to add wrapper functions around GMainContext's functions, such
> as g_main_context_acquire(), g_main_context_prepare(), which brings
> extra effort if you want to form a good and clear API layer. With
> this changes, all qemu's custom code is attached under Gsource, we
> have a clear GMainContext's API layer for event loop, no wrapper is
> needed, and the event's loop API is glib's API, a clear layer let
> me form a library or adding more things.
> 
> before:
> qemu's mainloop caller,  BH user, fd user
>                       |
>                    AioContext
>                       |
>                 GMainContext
> 
> 
> after:
> qemu's mainloop caller
>     |                                   BH user    fd user
> GmainContext                               |         |
>     |--------------------------------|--BhSource     |
>                                      |-------------FdSource
> 
> 
> Note:
>   FdSource could be split more into ThreadSource and FdSource, which
> distinguish more. It can be done easily if the change of this series
> is online, when found necessary.
> 
>   More reasons:
>   When I thinking how to bind library code to a thread context, it may
> need to add Context's concept into API of block.c. If I use AioContext,
> there will need a wrapper API to run the event loop. But If I got
> glib's GmainContext, things become simple.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-10  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-10  3:24 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Convert AioContext to Gsource sub classes Wenchao Xia
2013-08-10  8:03 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-08-12  6:46   ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-12  7:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-12 17:01       ` Michael Roth
2013-08-13  8:44         ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-15 15:23           ` Michael Roth
2013-08-15 16:32             ` Michael Roth
2013-08-16  7:15               ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-16  8:12                 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-20  9:59                   ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-20 17:54                     ` Alex Bligh
2013-08-21  8:45                     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-21  9:33                       ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-22 11:40                         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-21 10:06                       ` Alex Bligh
2013-08-10 10:15 ` Alex Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5205F3CA.1060009@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).