From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53337) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8F8s-0007IB-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:48:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8F8m-0001Dl-4j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:48:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]:39607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8F8l-0001DU-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:47:56 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fb10so6165824pad.9 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <520698E5.4080409@twiddle.net> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 09:47:49 -1000 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1376075958-21932-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <52066D7C.4020607@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Disassembly with external objdump List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Filippov Cc: Peter Maydell , gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Claudio Fontana , proljc@gmail.com On 08/10/2013 06:53 AM, Max Filippov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 08/10/2013 05:45 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Well, it depends. If we're going to dump all the in-tree >>> disassemblers and always use an external objdump, that's fine. >> >> It's tempting, given that the only internal disassemblers that >> are not missing opcodes are for the extinct cpus. > > Will that leave those CPUs without x/i support from monitor? Yes. One could always have qemu fork to objdump too. Though finding the right one could be tricky without help. > Does anybody use it? That I can't answer. r~