From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using aio_poll for timer carrier threads
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:32:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520B78C9.1010306@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A3EEF.5050509@siemens.com>
On 2013-08-13 16:13, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-08-13 15:45, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> This should make timers usable in another thread for clock device
>> emulation if only your iothread uses the AioContext and its timers
>> (besides the thread-safe mod/del interfaces).
>
> As argued in the other thread, I don't think we need (and want) locking
> in the timer subsystem, rather push this to its users. But I'll look
> again at your patches, if they are also usable.
I've checked and applied your two patches adding the active_timers lock.
This model apparently works as well for the RTC use case. And it avoids
having to patch aio_poll, the RTC device lock is now taken inside the
timer handlers.
I still need to check more corner cases as timer dequeuing can now race
with the handler execution, ie. a dequeued timer can still see one more
handler run after timer_del returned. That's a property one can easily
take into account when writing device models, but it has to be kept in
mind that it's different from current behavior.
Updated queue is at git://git.kiszka.org/qemu.git queues/rt.new3 again.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 7:56 [Qemu-devel] Using aio_poll for timer carrier threads Jan Kiszka
2013-08-13 13:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-13 14:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-14 0:48 ` liu ping fan
2013-08-14 8:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-14 9:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-14 11:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-14 12:32 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-08-19 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-13 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-13 14:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-19 13:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-19 13:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-19 14:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-19 13:58 ` Alex Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520B78C9.1010306@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).