From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36747)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <linux@roeck-us.net>) id 1V9cG7-0003Wq-Uz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:41:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <linux@roeck-us.net>) id 1V9cG1-0004ug-Op
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:41:11 -0400
Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:58242)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <linux@roeck-us.net>) id 1V9cG1-0004uY-JO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:41:05 -0400
Message-ID: <520B9700.7010105@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:41:04 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net>
	<CAFEAcA94ygwRPSsfxs3DvOcTZbdafLiEHys94FG4aXUx+A1t=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA97PuORg920f-A_8rvCgBq=k5Y=0W6m2Nv8nnzjY19Utg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA9BA7zfaO1J5zVaEcG-AgOo6dyiew08-o2eObuBe-KWig@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA_0kzS=Z5oTxrr=B74wjf1x=M6dXwH7Fcgf77Pca90Gjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net>
	<20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>

On 08/14/2013 05:44 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
>>> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
>>
>> Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
>> to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
>> change to this.
>>
>> Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
>> it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
>
> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my

Agreed.

> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
> boot a kernel).
>

That would be great. Thanks a lot for your help!

Guenter