From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-ppc: Fix page table lookup with kvm enabled
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:07:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5212189C.2090707@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376915356-31011-4-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Am 19.08.2013 14:29, schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> With kvm enabled, we store the hash page table information in the hypervisor.
> Use ioctl to read the htab contents. Without this we get the below error when
> trying to read the guest address
>
> (gdb) x/10 do_fork
> 0xc000000000098660 <do_fork>: Cannot access memory at address 0xc000000000098660
> (gdb)
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> target-ppc/kvm.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 3 ++-
> target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> index 5d4e613..63a9c0e 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -1885,3 +1885,48 @@ int kvm_arch_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr)
> void kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
> {
> }
> +
> +int kvmppc_hash64_load_hpte(CPUPPCState *env, __u64 index,
uint64_t in QEMU please, same in the header.
Could you replace CPUPPCState *env with the new PowerPCCPU *cpu as
argument, please? I don't see it actually being used though...
> + target_ulong *hpte0, target_ulong *hpte1)
> +{
> + int htab_fd;
> + struct kvm_get_htab_fd ghf;
> + struct kvm_get_htab_buf {
> + struct kvm_get_htab_header header;
> + /*
> + * Older kernel required one extra byte.
> + */
> + unsigned long hpte[3];
> + } hpte_buf;
> +
> + *hpte0 = 0;
> + *hpte1 = 0;
> + if (!cap_htab_fd) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + /*
> + * At this point we are only interested in reading only bolted entries
> + */
> + ghf.flags = KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY;
> + ghf.start_index = index;
> + htab_fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD, &ghf);
> + if (htab_fd < 0) {
> + return htab_fd;
> + }
> +
> + if (read(htab_fd, &hpte_buf, sizeof(hpte_buf)) < 0) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We only requested for one entry, So we should get only 1
> + * valid entry at the same index
> + */
> + if (hpte_buf.header.n_valid != 1 || hpte_buf.header.index != index) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + *hpte0 = hpte_buf.hpte[0];
> + *hpte1 = hpte_buf.hpte[1];
> +out:
> + close(htab_fd);
> + return 0;
Double space :)
> +}
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> index 4ae7bf2..51c8952 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ int kvmppc_get_htab_fd(bool write);
> int kvmppc_save_htab(QEMUFile *f, int fd, size_t bufsize, int64_t max_ns);
> int kvmppc_load_htab_chunk(QEMUFile *f, int fd, uint32_t index,
> uint16_t n_valid, uint16_t n_invalid);
> -
> +int kvmppc_hash64_load_hpte(CPUPPCState *env, __u64 index,
> + target_ulong *hpte0, target_ulong *hpte1);
> #else
>
> static inline uint32_t kvmppc_get_tbfreq(void)
> diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index 67fc1b5..239f268 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -302,17 +302,26 @@ static int ppc_hash64_amr_prot(CPUPPCState *env, ppc_hash_pte64_t pte)
> return prot;
> }
>
> -static hwaddr ppc_hash64_pteg_search(CPUPPCState *env, hwaddr pteg_off,
> +static hwaddr ppc_hash64_pteg_search(CPUPPCState *env, hwaddr hash,
> bool secondary, target_ulong ptem,
> ppc_hash_pte64_t *pte)
> {
> - hwaddr pte_offset = pteg_off;
> + __u64 index;
This is not KVM code, so definitely uint64_t for cross-platform support.
> + hwaddr pte_offset;
> target_ulong pte0, pte1;
> int i;
>
> + pte_offset = (hash * HASH_PTEG_SIZE_64) & env->htab_mask;;
> + index = (hash * HPTES_PER_GROUP) & env->htab_mask;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < HPTES_PER_GROUP; i++) {
> - pte0 = ppc_hash64_load_hpte0(env, pte_offset);
> - pte1 = ppc_hash64_load_hpte1(env, pte_offset);
> + if (kvm_enabled()) {
> + index += i;
> + kvmppc_hash64_load_hpte(env, index, &pte0, &pte1);
ppc_env_get_cpu(env) would get you the PowerPCCPU* here, if needed.
Regards,
Andreas
> + } else {
> + pte0 = ppc_hash64_load_hpte0(env, pte_offset);
> + pte1 = ppc_hash64_load_hpte1(env, pte_offset);
> + }
>
> if ((pte0 & HPTE64_V_VALID)
> && (secondary == !!(pte0 & HPTE64_V_SECONDARY))
> @@ -332,7 +341,7 @@ static hwaddr ppc_hash64_htab_lookup(CPUPPCState *env,
> ppc_slb_t *slb, target_ulong eaddr,
> ppc_hash_pte64_t *pte)
> {
> - hwaddr pteg_off, pte_offset;
> + hwaddr pte_offset;
> hwaddr hash;
> uint64_t vsid, epnshift, epnmask, epn, ptem;
>
> @@ -367,8 +376,7 @@ static hwaddr ppc_hash64_htab_lookup(CPUPPCState *env,
> " vsid=" TARGET_FMT_lx " ptem=" TARGET_FMT_lx
> " hash=" TARGET_FMT_plx "\n",
> env->htab_base, env->htab_mask, vsid, ptem, hash);
> - pteg_off = (hash * HASH_PTEG_SIZE_64) & env->htab_mask;
> - pte_offset = ppc_hash64_pteg_search(env, pteg_off, 0, ptem, pte);
> + pte_offset = ppc_hash64_pteg_search(env, hash, 0, ptem, pte);
>
> if (pte_offset == -1) {
> /* Secondary PTEG lookup */
> @@ -377,8 +385,7 @@ static hwaddr ppc_hash64_htab_lookup(CPUPPCState *env,
> " hash=" TARGET_FMT_plx "\n", env->htab_base,
> env->htab_mask, vsid, ptem, ~hash);
>
> - pteg_off = (~hash * HASH_PTEG_SIZE_64) & env->htab_mask;
> - pte_offset = ppc_hash64_pteg_search(env, pteg_off, 1, ptem, pte);
> + pte_offset = ppc_hash64_pteg_search(env, ~hash, 1, ptem, pte);
> }
>
> return pte_offset;
>
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 12:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] target-ppc: Add support for dumping guest memory using qemu gdb server Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-08-19 12:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-ppc: Update slb array with correct index values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-08-19 12:42 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-19 12:50 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-19 12:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-ppc: Use #define instead of opencoding SLB valid bit Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-08-19 12:44 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-19 12:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-ppc: Fix page table lookup with kvm enabled Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-08-19 13:07 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-08-19 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] target-ppc: Add support for dumping guest memory using qemu gdb server Andreas Färber
2013-08-20 8:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-08-20 12:49 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5212189C.2090707@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).