From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBsN-0000hS-Cq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBsH-0004lF-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBsG-0004kt-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:12 -0400 Message-ID: <5214F38D.2020004@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:06:21 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377103396-24307-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1377103396-24307-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20130821170120.GA12305@redhat.com> <5214F273.9060806@redhat.com> <20130821170707.GA12410@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130821170707.GA12410@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our >>>>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side. >>>>> >>>>> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >>>>> ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence >>>>> in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >>> So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic" >> >> More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find >> anything that's utterly broken in the design". >> >> And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin >> pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible". > > isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that. > > NACK You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you, it can be me), don't you? Paolo