From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com,
hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
armbru@redhat.com, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com,
anthony@codemonkey.ws, lcapitulino@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com,
afaerber@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Start fixing the pvpanic mess
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:10:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5214F496.7050407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5214F2C0.8050203@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 21/08/2013 19:02, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> So, this boils down to a question of what SHOULD the valid states
> for <on_crash> be? Generically, we want
> <on_crash>destroy</on_crash> to not invalidate a guest, but also to
> not instantiate a pvpanic device; since that covers the libvirt
> defaults. We also want <on_crash>restart</on_crash> to not
> invalidate a guest, but also to not instantiate a pvpanic device,
> since so many existing guests have that setting thanks to
> virt-install.
>
> Maybe that means we add attributes/sub-elements to <on_crash> that
> express whether pvpanic device is permitted; and the absence of
> that attribute means the status quo (the <on_crash> tag is
> effectively ignored because without pvpanic device, there is no way
> for libvirt to learn if a guest panicked). Or does it mean we
> expose a new sub-element of <devices>, similar to how we have a
> <memballoon> subelement that controls whether the memballoon device
> is show to the guest, and just document that for qemu, <on_crash>
> is a no-op without the <pvpanic> subelement?
Perhaps <panic_notifier bus='isa'/> is better? Note that for s390
<on_crash> works without <pvpanic>.
Anyway yes, that's a possibility.
More precisely, you could still use <on_crash> for internal errors
even without having anything in <devices> (Xen conflates panics and
internal errors).
But then, "pause" and "ignore" are useful on-panic policies, yet they
do not make sense for internal errors. Hence my suggestion to
introduce a new element <on_panic>. We can still make <on_panic> a
no-op without the appropriate element under <devices>.
Paolo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=nCgT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 16:43 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Start fixing the pvpanic mess Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] vl: allow "cont" from panicked state Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] pc: get rid of builtin pvpanic Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:07 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-21 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-22 12:43 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-22 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-25 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-22 16:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-25 10:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:35 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-21 17:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Start fixing the pvpanic mess Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-21 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:55 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-21 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:10 ` Eric Blake
2013-08-21 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-22 9:17 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-21 17:02 ` Eric Blake
2013-08-21 17:10 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-08-21 17:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5214F496.7050407@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rhod@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).