From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCFKl-0003Do-CT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:48:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCFKg-0005YI-Ff for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:48:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCFKg-0005Y7-7u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:48:46 -0400 Message-ID: <521527AA.4060200@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:48:42 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377015041-6567-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1377015041-6567-9-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <521397E4.90608@suse.de> <20130820143920.331c2716@redhat.com> <5213C070.8020300@suse.de> <521472D9.8060806@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <521472D9.8060806@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k57mpUsMAeCEGbC6D4Hxbipa0XEP40jPA" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/11] add "test-int128" and "test-bitops" to .gitignore List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Luiz Capitulino , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , anthony@codemonkey.ws, qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --k57mpUsMAeCEGbC6D4Hxbipa0XEP40jPA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/21/2013 01:57 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> I think we could consolidate everything in tests/.gitignore. But can = we >>> do it as an incremental patch? It's a very small cosmetic thing to re= spin >>> the series and my pull request. >> >> Sure, it's not a bug. >=20 > Is it OK if I submit a patch moving the test-* entries over to > tests/.gitignore once Anthony applies this? (I'm offering because it's > not clear to me who's planning to do it.) Bikeshedding alert - I personally like having a single top-level =2Egitignore for everything. We don't live in CVS days where you had to have per-directory ignores, and having one file is easier to maintain (in the future, it's easier to know WHICH .gitignore to add a new entry to if there is only ONE .gitignore). I don't care enough to write the patch myself, nor to care if you end up keeping the split .gitignore, but if I did care, I'd be consolidating in the opposite direction (move tests/.gitignore to the toplevel). --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --k57mpUsMAeCEGbC6D4Hxbipa0XEP40jPA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSFSerAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqF74H+QFcn2QpZIo+9S94mFtlVNMP tb9LqSDfWnfVHvfBAH0BNhekJVUXEmi7r+8dv1tv1r2ll7hDxOvAEMuay9IXIhiQ S9cQfR5Hj4YdqxDU1m1tUHd88kas8iVeQxj6rqOEmpwi3u6x8U7zo2iXYnJGL1yx jHoQ4bBJlSFpRBXqzsenRfE8XQZPjJBIWzceXODGzb58QzbstWNAMVS1QwHGmv1k HGCTvimIWQCjw2BwbDhYcgIQSP1pne2zZj8tfZiPkTsQrvVnJIEIvD7YBfYuuxGI 072hqFAvBzVCIt1r/HxwiOGLCNNB3wmMeHJe0SDCWw1MC7T0PHr4AVP8oToh6u8= =qR5p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k57mpUsMAeCEGbC6D4Hxbipa0XEP40jPA--