From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50515)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VCUDs-0005Wy-61
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:42:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VCUDm-0005w2-5e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:42:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53582)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VCUDl-0005vr-US
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:42:38 -0400
Message-ID: <5216070F.8090900@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:41:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1377103396-24307-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1377103396-24307-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20130821170120.GA12305@redhat.com> <5214F273.9060806@redhat.com>
	<20130821170707.GA12410@redhat.com>
	<5214F38D.2020004@redhat.com> <52160770.90908@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <52160770.90908@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de

Il 22/08/2013 14:43, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
> On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> 
>>> NACK
>>
>> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
>> it can be me), don't you?
> 
> going meta...
> 
> What's this?
> 
> All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony
> prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard
> requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches
> in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged).
> 
> No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that
> is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere?
> 
> Sorry for wasting time...

No, it's not.  But for example I NACKed removal of pvpanic from 1.6, it
was overridden, and I didn't complain too much.

Paolo