From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com,
hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rhod@redhat.com,
kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
afaerber@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:43:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52160770.90908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5214F38D.2020004@redhat.com>
On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> NACK
>
> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
> it can be me), don't you?
going meta...
What's this?
All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony
prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard
requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches
in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged).
No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that
is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere?
Sorry for wasting time...
Thanks,
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 16:43 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Start fixing the pvpanic mess Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] vl: allow "cont" from panicked state Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] pc: get rid of builtin pvpanic Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:07 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-21 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-22 12:43 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-08-22 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-25 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-22 16:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-25 10:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:35 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-21 17:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Start fixing the pvpanic mess Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-21 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 16:55 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-21 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:10 ` Eric Blake
2013-08-21 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-22 9:17 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-21 17:02 ` Eric Blake
2013-08-21 17:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-21 17:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-21 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52160770.90908@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rhod@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).