From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50192)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1VCUCO-0004Ri-TM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:41:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1VCUCI-0005cV-Ul
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:41:12 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7456)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1VCUCI-0005cH-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:41:06 -0400
Message-ID: <52160770.90908@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:43:28 +0200
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1377103396-24307-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1377103396-24307-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20130821170120.GA12305@redhat.com> <5214F273.9060806@redhat.com>
	<20130821170707.GA12410@redhat.com> <5214F38D.2020004@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5214F38D.2020004@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de

On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:

>> NACK
> 
> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
> it can be me), don't you?

going meta...

What's this?

All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony
prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard
requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches
in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged).

No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that
is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere?

Sorry for wasting time...

Thanks,
Laszlo