From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCbae-0006SN-DS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:34:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCbaY-0004Kk-Fi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:34:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCbaY-0004Kb-7o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:34:38 -0400 Message-ID: <5216766B.8030709@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:36:59 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377187852-11192-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87mwo9smjf.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <52164FFD.5030101@redhat.com> <521663A9.6040207@redhat.com> <87eh9lqyhp.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87eh9lqyhp.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini , lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On 08/22/13 22:09, Anthony Liguori wrote: > The difference is that ACPI or platform devices in general are > unexpected to be added. By definition it means that the motherboard has > most likely been changed. You could encounter a new ACPI artifact after simply re-flashing your MB with an updated BIOS, without opening the chassis. "If windows can't deal with that, their loss!" :) Laszlo /hides