From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEPqm-0006rg-0G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:26:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEPqd-0001xS-Jg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:26:51 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:61449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEPqd-0001xO-Aw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:26:43 -0400 Message-ID: <521D0B84.8040301@rdsoftware.de> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:26:44 +0200 From: Erik Rull MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <586568842.455717.1377510746935.open-xchange@email.1und1.de> <20130827073833.GB24247@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130827073833.GB24247@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Boot Problems Windows XP guest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Erik Rull wrote: >> is it possible to get back to the "legacy" BIOS instead of the (u)efi based >> BIOS? I have problems booting the guest on a SSD HDD, there it reboots >> infinitely, when running the guest on a rotating HDD, it works. On qemu 1.2.0 >> both disks work properly. I didn't find a way to select the BIOS type in QEMU. > > You can specify the BIOS blob to use with the -bios option. > > Not sure about the issue you are describing. SeaBIOS is a BIOS, not > UEFI. > > Stefan > Hi Stefan, which BIOS is selected by default? It's more a guess, there must be a change between 1.2.0 and 1.6.0 that prevents a simple Windows XP from booting completely, if the guest HDD image is placed on a SSD. On a rotating HDD (with the same commandline except the path to the image) it boots successfully. The only difference is the speed of the disk access. I will try an alternative BIOS, maybe this fixes it, if not I will try to do some regression tests, first trying 1.4.0. Best regards, Erik