From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42209)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VEfzv-0001Jm-4S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:41:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VEfzp-0005a7-5t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:41:23 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23007)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VEfzo-0005a2-Ux
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:41:17 -0400
Message-ID: <521DFDF6.3070507@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:41:10 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <586568842.455717.1377510746935.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>
	<20130827073833.GB24247@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
	<521D0B84.8040301@rdsoftware.de> <521D1AB0.1070904@redhat.com>
	<20130828075020.GA4696@stefanha-thinkpad.muc.redhat.com>
	<163348110.541056.1377680875692.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>
	<521DF7C1.50805@redhat.com> <20130828133410.GB6170@irqsave.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130828133410.GB6170@irqsave.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Boot Problems Windows XP guest
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt_Canet?= <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
Cc: Erik Rull <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>

Il 28/08/2013 15:34, Beno=EEt Canet ha scritto:
>> On second thought that is expected.  Until throttling kicks in, I/O wi=
ll
>> complete just as fast as without throttling.  Maybe limiting the numbe=
r
>> of bytes per second instead of I/O ops would be better.  Can you try
>> -drive ...,bps=3D1048576 (possibly higher or lower numbers too)?
>>
>> And maybe Benoit's new algorithm could help too.  Benoit, do you have =
a
>> tree for Erik to try?
>=20
> Hi Eric,
>=20
> You can find my latest throttling work on the leaky_continuous_final2 b=
ranch
> of the following git tree.
>=20
> git clone git@gitorious.org:benoit-canet-qemu/benoit-canet-qemu.git
> git checkout leaky_continuous_final2

What is the command line to use for avg bps =3D 1MB/s, max bps =3D 0?

Paolo