From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEgkO-0007H5-KA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:29:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEgkI-0004Bw-KU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:29:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEgkI-0004Bp-Cu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:29:18 -0400 Message-ID: <521E093A.6010605@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:29:14 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377170965-9905-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <521DC6E5.9000304@ozlabs.ru> <521DDA4F.30404@redhat.com> <1377699047.10408.55.camel@ul30vt.home> In-Reply-To: <1377699047.10408.55.camel@ul30vt.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio: fixes for better support for 128 bit memory section sizes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 28/08/2013 16:10, Alex Williamson ha scritto: > On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 13:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 28/08/2013 11:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> On 08/22/2013 09:29 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> I made a couple of small patches while debugging VFIO on SPAPR >>>> which uses IOMMU MemoryRegion 2^64 bytes long. >>>> >>>> Changes: >>>> v3: >>>> * "int128: add int128_exts64()" updated >>>> >>>> v2: >>>> * added int128_exts64() function as a separate patch and used in >>>> "vfio: Fix 128 bit handling" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >>>> int128: add int128_exts64() >>>> vfio: Fix debug output for int128 values >>>> vfio: Fix 128 bit handling >>>> >>>> hw/misc/vfio.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ >>>> include/qemu/int128.h | 5 +++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> Ping? I fixed everything I was told to, is there anything left? Or we need >>> to decide through which tree this should go? :) Thanks! >> >> I think it should go through Alex's tree, but he may be busy due to the >> impending opening of the Linux merge window. > > I can take it if you could ACK the first patch. Thanks, Sure, consider it acked. :) Paolo