Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: Use DeviceClass::fw_name for device tree CPU node

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 30.08.2013 15:21, schrieb Alexander Graf:
> 
> On 16.08.2013, at 00:35, Andreas Färber wrote:
> 
>> Instead of relying on cpu_model, obtain the device tree node label
>> per CPU. Use DeviceClass::fw_name when available. This implicitly
>> resolves HOST@0 node labels for those CPUs through inheritance.
>>
>> Whenever DeviceClass::fw_name is not available, derive it from the CPU's
>> type name and fill it in for that class with a "PowerPC," prefix for
>> PAPR compliance.
> 
> Could we just mandate the fw_name field to always be set for all classes instead?

Sure, we can assert it. But we would then need to set fw_name for the
various 970 families at least, which I have been using with pseries in
the past. Cell and POWER6 are TODO so I'm not concerned about them. Not
sure about RS64 that Alexey mentioned - I wouldn't be able to test.
Would be bad to regress and abort with CPU models that were working okay
before.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg