From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/22] Refactor machine support
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:49:49 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522215625.2706941276008589258.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <332590591.2705881276008246310.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
> The magic I'm preferring to is precisely things like pci="on".
Hmm, pci=on is magic indeed. :-)
> What I'm objecting to is making machine construction be controlled by an
> arbitrary set of hardcoded parameters.
> My argument is that in the short term this parameterization provides limited
> benefit, and longer term it's going to be obsolete and probably painful to
> support.
Then it would be enough to have these options available internally for use
in the machine-core but not export them to the command-line. If we only
aim at using management interfaces to use the interface we can be very
conservative and not export even things like default_drive.
Paolo
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <332590591.2705881276008246310.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-06-08 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-06-07 23:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/22] Refactor machine support Anthony Liguori
2010-06-08 3:12 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-08 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-08 14:30 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-08 15:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-08 15:36 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-08 15:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-08 16:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-08 21:05 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-08 21:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-08 17:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 2:11 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-09 13:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 14:30 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-09 20:47 ` Blue Swirl
2010-06-09 20:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 21:09 ` Blue Swirl
2010-06-09 22:26 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522215625.2706941276008589258.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).