From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Zhanghaoyu (A)" <haoyu.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: "Huangweidong (C)" <weidong.huang@huawei.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"paolo.bonzini@gmail.com" <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>,
Luonengjun <luonengjun@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [KVM] segmentation fault happened when reboot VM after hot-uplug virtio NIC
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:57:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5225EAE3.8060202@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D3E216785288A145B7BC975F83A2ED103FF12316@szxeml556-mbx.china.huawei.com>
On 2013-09-03 15:22, Zhanghaoyu (A) wrote:
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>> Segmentation fault happened when reboot VM after hot-unplug virtio NIC, which can be reproduced 100%.
>>> See similar bug report to
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988256
>>>
>>> test environment:
>>> host: SLES11SP2 (kenrel version: 3.0.58)
>>> qemu: 1.5.1, upstream-qemu (commit
>>> 545825d4cda03ea292b7788b3401b99860efe8bc)
>>> libvirt: 1.1.0
>>> guest os: win2k8 R2 x64bit or sles11sp2 x64 or win2k3 32bit
>>>
>>> You can reproduce this problem by following steps:
>>> 1. start a VM with virtio NIC(s)
>>> 2. hot-unplug a virtio NIC from the VM 3. reboot the VM, then
>>> segmentation fault happened during starting period
>>>
>>> the qemu backtrace shown as below:
>>> #0 0x00007ff4be3288d0 in __memcmp_sse4_1 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>>> #1 0x00007ff4c07f82c0 in patch_hypercalls (s=0x7ff4c15dd610) at
>>> /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c:549
>>> #2 0x00007ff4c07f84f0 in vapic_prepare (s=0x7ff4c15dd610) at
>>> /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c:614
>>> #3 0x00007ff4c07f85e7 in vapic_write (opaque=0x7ff4c15dd610, addr=0, data=32, size=2)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c:651
>>> #4 0x00007ff4c082a917 in memory_region_write_accessor (opaque=0x7ff4c15df938, addr=0, value=0x7ff4bbfe3d00, size=2,
>>> shift=0, mask=65535) at
>>> /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/memory.c:334
>>> #5 0x00007ff4c082a9ee in access_with_adjusted_size (addr=0, value=0x7ff4bbfe3d00, size=2, access_size_min=1,
>>> access_size_max=4, access=0x7ff4c082a89a <memory_region_write_accessor>, opaque=0x7ff4c15df938)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/memory.c:364
>>> #6 0x00007ff4c082ae49 in memory_region_iorange_write (iorange=0x7ff4c15dfca0, offset=0, width=2, data=32)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/memory.c:439
>>> #7 0x00007ff4c08236f7 in ioport_writew_thunk (opaque=0x7ff4c15dfca0, addr=126, data=32)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/ioport.c:219
>>> #8 0x00007ff4c0823078 in ioport_write (index=1, address=126, data=32)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/ioport.c:83
>>> #9 0x00007ff4c0823ca9 in cpu_outw (addr=126, val=32) at
>>> /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/ioport.c:296
>>> #10 0x00007ff4c0827485 in kvm_handle_io (port=126, data=0x7ff4c0510000, direction=1, size=2, count=1)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/kvm-all.c:1485
>>> #11 0x00007ff4c0827e14 in kvm_cpu_exec (env=0x7ff4c15bf270) at
>>> /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/kvm-all.c:1634
>>> #12 0x00007ff4c07b6f27 in qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn (arg=0x7ff4c15bf270)
>>> at /mnt/zhanghaoyu/qemu/qemu-1.5.1/cpus.c:759
>>> #13 0x00007ff4be58af05 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>>> #14 0x00007ff4be2cd53d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>>>
>>> If I apply below patch to the upstream qemu, this problem will
>>> disappear,
>>> ---
>>> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c index
>>> 15beb80..6fff299 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
>>> @@ -652,11 +652,11 @@ static void vapic_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t data,
>>> switch (size) {
>>> case 2:
>>> if (s->state == VAPIC_INACTIVE) {
>>> - rom_paddr = (env->segs[R_CS].base + env->eip) & ROM_BLOCK_MASK;
>>> - s->rom_state_paddr = rom_paddr + data;
>>> -
>>> s->state = VAPIC_STANDBY;
>>> }
>>> + rom_paddr = (env->segs[R_CS].base + env->eip) & ROM_BLOCK_MASK;
>>> + s->rom_state_paddr = rom_paddr + data;
>>> +
>>> if (vapic_prepare(s) < 0) {
>>> s->state = VAPIC_INACTIVE;
>>> break;
>>
>> Yes, we need to update the ROM's physical address after the BIOS reshuffled the layout.
>>
>> But I'm not happy with simply updating the address unconditionally. We need to understand the crash first, then make QEMU robust against the guest not issuing this initial write after a ROM region layout change.
>> And finally make it work properly in the normal case.
>>
> The direct cause of crash is trying to access invalid address, which is due to not updating the rom's physical address.
> In my opinion, since hot-plug/unplug involved in, we need to re-calculate rom's physical address for all devices which have rom during starting period when reboot/reset vm,
> is it reasonable to set vapic's state to VAPIC_INACTIVE during vapic's reset?
I checked meanwhile, and it should be sufficient to make the VAPIC state
working again under sane conditions.
Still, this is not yet satisfying /wrt what *precisely* went wrong when
the physical address became incorrect, and if a malicious guest could
exploit this (e.g. by invoking the 16-bit write from an address outside
the VAPIC ROM).
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-03 12:06 [Qemu-devel] [KVM] segmentation fault happened when reboot VM after hot-uplug virtio NIC Zhanghaoyu (A)
2013-09-03 12:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-03 12:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-03 12:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-03 13:22 ` Zhanghaoyu (A)
2013-09-03 13:57 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-09-03 14:27 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5225EAE3.8060202@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=haoyu.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=luonengjun@huawei.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).