From: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
wad@chromium.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: adding a second whitelist
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:07:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52264199.3090301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3584106.zoRa73cOQX@sifl>
On 09/03/2013 03:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 02:08:28 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 02:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>>> On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>>>> On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>>>>>> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The
>>>>>> second
>>>>>> whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
>>>>>
>>>>> -netdev tap,downscript=/path/to/script requires exec() in the QEMU
>>>>> shutdown code path. Will this work with seccomp?
>>>>
>>>> I actually don't know, but I'll test that as well. Can you run a test
>>>> with this patch and -netdev? I mean, if you're pointing that out you
>>>> might have a scenario already setup, right?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> This uses exec() in net/tap.c.
>>>
>>> I think if we're going to introduce a sandbox environment that restricts
>>> existing QEMU behavior, then we have to introduce a new argument to the
>>> -sandbox option. So for example, "-sandbox on" would continue to use
>>> the whitelist that allows everything in QEMU to work (or at least it
>>> should :). And something like "-sandbox on,strict=on" would use the
>>> whitelist + blacklist.
>>>
>>> If this is acceptable though, then I wonder how we could go about adding
>>> new syscalls to the blacklist in future QEMU releases without regressing
>>> "-sandbox on,strict=on".
>>
>> Maybe a better approach is to provide support that allows libvirt to
>> define the blacklist and pass it to QEMU?
>
> FYI: I didn't want to mention this until I had some patches ready to post, but
> I'm currently working on adding syscall filtering, via libseccomp, to libvirt.
> I hope to get an initial RFC-quality patch out "soon".
>
Paul, if you need any help with Qemu and/or testing, please let me know.
I would be glad to help :) When you post your RFC to libvirt mailing
list please add me as CC.
--
Eduardo Otubo
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 1:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: adding a second whitelist Eduardo Otubo
2013-08-29 8:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-29 8:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-30 14:22 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-08-30 14:21 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-08-30 15:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-30 15:42 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-02 9:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-09-03 18:02 ` Corey Bryant
2013-09-03 18:08 ` Corey Bryant
2013-09-03 18:21 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-03 18:23 ` Corey Bryant
2013-09-03 20:07 ` Eduardo Otubo [this message]
2013-09-03 21:49 ` Paul Moore
2013-09-03 20:05 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-09-03 21:08 ` Corey Bryant
2013-08-29 12:56 ` Paul Moore
2013-08-30 14:27 ` Eduardo Otubo
2013-08-30 15:32 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52264199.3090301@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).