From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHAob-0007rU-8O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:00:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHAoV-00021u-9s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:00:01 -0400 Message-ID: <5227128D.705@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:59:25 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1378191917-6964-1-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <52258E44.9010704@redhat.com> <52259F6E.3000205@suse.de> <5225C559.2030601@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <52261431.5050705@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <52261431.5050705@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] cputlb: remove dead function tlb_update_dirty List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-trivial , Jan Kiszka , Michael Tokarev , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel , liguang , Richard Henderson Il 03/09/2013 18:54, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: > Also, I am seeing Paolo pull in huge memory changes but now pinging the > breakage fixes rather than assembling a pull to fix the fallout. ;) Well, I didn't put myself as memory maintainer for a reason. :) But it looks like a pull request is the best thing to do, so I'll find some time this week to make one. Paolo