From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39521)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VHShH-0004j5-Al
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 02:05:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VHShB-0004cF-6o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 02:05:39 -0400
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52281F2B.8030907@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:05:31 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20130904210844.4cd6164e@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130904210844.4cd6164e@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG: memory API related abort (bisected)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: rth@twiddle.net, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu-stable@nongnu.org

Il 05/09/2013 03:08, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> Reproducer:
> 
>  1. Start QEMU with gdb support:
> 
>     $ qemu [...] -kernel [...] -s
> 
>  2. Start gdb and install a breakpoint
> 
>     gdb /path/to/vmlinux
>     (gdb) target remote localhost:1234
>     (gdb) b init_hw_perf_events
>     Remote communication error.  Target disconnected.: Connection reset by peer.
> 
>  3. Kaboom on QEMU terminal
> 
> According to bisect the culprit is:
> 
> commit 23326164ae6fe8d94b7eff123e03f97ca6978d33
> Author: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Date:   Mon Jul 8 14:55:59 2013 -0700
> 
>     exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw
>     
>     Honor the implementation maximum access size, and at least check
>     the minimum access size.

Already reported twice, missed 1.6, will send pull request today or
tomorrow.  Sorry for the breakage.

Paolo