From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60285)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VJ1pA-0000I1-F9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:48:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VJ1p4-0006TW-AX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:48:16 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62974)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VJ1p4-0006Sl-1m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:48:10 -0400
Message-ID: <522DD199.2020508@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:48:09 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1378297508-7242-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<522A21C2.3010801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<522DA514.5070702@redhat.com> <11305371.SUiNjF4f3Q@sifl>
	<522DCB0A.30406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <522DCB0A.30406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] seccomp submaintainer? (was Re: [PATCH] seccomp:
 adding times() to the whitelist)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

Il 09/09/2013 15:20, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto:
>> Out of respect for the work that Eduardo has done, and is
>> continuing to do, with the QEMU seccomp filtering, I think Eduardo
>> should be the one to take on this role. If Eduardo declines I'll do
>> ahead and submit a patch adding myself to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> If this is ok for everyone, I would be really glad to take this role to
> myself. Paul, thanks for this vote of confidence. Paolo, should I send a
> patch for MAINTAINERS right away?

Ok, I was suggesting Paul because he was the one doing reviews.

Eduardo, that is also okay for me.  However, even as a maintainer please
do wait for Paul's reviews.  Many areas of QEMU have maintainers that do
not send their own patches without a review, so this wouldn't be a new
rule. :)

Please wait for Anthony's ack.  I changed the subject and CCed him to
grab his attention.

Paolo