From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45629)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VJIby-0004Zu-JD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:43:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VJIbs-0004k6-G5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:43:46 -0400
Message-ID: <522ECDA2.9060602@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:43:30 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1378247351-8446-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org>
	<1378247351-8446-6-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org>
	<5226CCD4.2030204@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_5FxE0PoFDQZWtd27tHLZKF4GcC1A9321+2XfL45zEgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5226EB43.203@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA-g09gY0Kyc_g=AAyOQvVss5zDSzPoMTVVPChgwZQw-iQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<522E362B.4030208@reactos.org>
In-Reply-To: <522E362B.4030208@reactos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/10] raven: set a correct PCI I/O
	memory region
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIFBvdXNzaW5lYXU=?= <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>, "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Il 09/09/2013 22:57, Herv=C3=A9 Poussineau ha scritto:
>>
>=20
> Paolo, Peter, so, did we raise some consensus? Should I reuse
> get_system_io(), or having a separate MemoryRegion is acceptable?
> I think that creating a independant MemoryRegion is better, as I see no
> reason why QEMU should provide a global I/O region, which has some sens=
e
> mostly on x86 architectures only.
> However, I can rework patches to use get_system_io() if that's what you
> prefer...

Since alpha-softmmu and versatile have established a precedent, your
patch is fine.

Thanks!

Paolo