From: "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: remove explicit check to 64K ioport size
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 09:52:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52356757.4010303@reactos.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130915063515.GA29086@redhat.com>
Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0200, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
>> This check is useless, as bigger addresses will be ignored when
>> added to 'io' MemoryRegion, which has a size of 64K.
>>
>> However, some architectures don't use the 'io' MemoryRegion, like
>> the alpha and versatile platforms. They create a PCI I/O region
>> bigger than 64K, so let them handle PCI I/O BARs in the higher range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>
>> ---
>> hw/pci/pci.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
>> index d00682e..a8e2b29 100644
>> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -1028,8 +1028,7 @@ static pcibus_t pci_bar_address(PCIDevice *d,
>> }
>> new_addr = pci_get_long(d->config + bar) & ~(size - 1);
>> last_addr = new_addr + size - 1;
>> - /* NOTE: we have only 64K ioports on PC */
>> - if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0 || last_addr > UINT16_MAX) {
>> + if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0) {
>> return PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED;
>> }
>> return new_addr;
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>
> We still didn't fix the overlap for PCI BARs properly
> so it looks like the following is needed on top.
> Could you please check whether this works for you on versatile/alpha?
Yes, alpha and versatile still seem to work.
Hervé
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index d452135..3118854 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1028,7 +1028,10 @@ static pcibus_t pci_bar_address(PCIDevice *d,
> }
> new_addr = pci_get_long(d->config + bar) & ~(size - 1);
> last_addr = new_addr + size - 1;
> - if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0) {
> + /* Check if BAR is being sized explicitly.
> + * TODO: make priorities correct and remove this work around.
> + */
> + if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0 || last_addr >= UINT32_MAX) {
> return PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED;
> }
> return new_addr;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-15 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 11:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: remove explicit check to 64K ioport size Hervé Poussineau
2013-09-14 18:40 ` Richard Henderson
2013-09-15 6:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-15 7:52 ` Hervé Poussineau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52356757.4010303@reactos.org \
--to=hpoussin@reactos.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).