From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47500)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avg@FreeBSD.org>) id 1VLtbt-0008Vu-AM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:38:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avg@FreeBSD.org>) id 1VLtbl-0001RD-Tj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:38:25 -0400
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua ([212.40.38.140]:2529)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avg@FreeBSD.org>) id 1VLtbl-0001Pu-GN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:38:17 -0400
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA07254
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:38:14 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1VLtbh-000Irt-KR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:38:13 +0300
Message-ID: <52383EED.6080602@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:37:17 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] in_asm substitute for accel=kvm:tcg
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


It seems that when qemu is run with accel=kvm:tcg then -d in_asm does not
produce anything.  At least, with the qemu and kvm that I have access to.
Is there any way to obtain equivalent logging in such a configuration?
A note: a host and a guest are both amd64 (x86_64).

Some background.  I am trying to debug a problem with booting a FreeBSD VM.  If
acceleration is not used then the VM boots just fine.  But with acceleration the
boot process hangs somewhere in FreeBSD boot loader, judging from what I see on
a screen.
I suspect that there could be a problem with jumping from real to protected mode
or some such "exotic" environment.  To narrow down the possibilities I would
like to examine execution trace and see where execution goes into the weeds.

Thank you very much in advance.
-- 
Andriy Gapon