Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/33] tcg-aarch64: Introduce tcg_fmt_Rdnm and tcg_fmt_Rdnm_lsl

[Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>]

On 09/17/2013 01:23 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> It would have been handy if ARM had officially assigned identifiers to the
>> formats, like Power, S390, and ia64 do.  Then one can build in the format ids
>> into both the function and enumeration names and use the preprocessor for
>> typechecking (c.f. the tcg_out_insn macro in  tcg/s390/tcg-target.c).
> 
> No need to do force explicit typechecking like that.
> That kind of use of the preprocessor really hurts.

Why do you believe this?  Have you browsed through the s390 backend?
I think it's a remarkably clean solution -- one we ought to have used
in the ia64 backend, which has even more format codes.


>> Therefore I think adding LSR, ASR and ROR shifts is both a waste of time and
>> bloats the backend.
> 
> I agree, lets just keep only left shift and right shift.
> Distinguishing the two costs one comparison per call, I think we can survive it.

I don't understand you at all.

You agree that removing the unused shift from cmp is sensible.
You agree that not adding unused asr/ror shifts is sensible.
But you insist that the unused lsr shift should be retained?

You complain about wasting Y space in my positioning of comments.
But you insist on wasting X space, and allowing the possibility of
mismatch, by requiring format names to be duplicated?


r~