From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: rusty@au1.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: do not relay a previous driver's WCE configuration to the current
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:28:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523C234D.2020003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130920095424.GD2800@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
Il 20/09/2013 11:54, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> Am 19.09.2013 um 18:48 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> The following sequence happens:
>> - the SeaBIOS virtio-blk driver does not support the WCE feature, which
>> causes QEMU to disable writeback caching
>>
>> - the Linux virtio-blk driver resets the device, finds WCE is available
>> but writeback caching is disabled; tells block layer to not send cache
>> flush commands
>>
>> - the Linux virtio-blk driver sets the DRIVER_OK bit, which causes
>> writeback caching to be re-enabled, but the Linux virtio-blk driver does
>> not know of this side effect and cache flushes remain disabled
>>
>> The bug is at the third step. If the guest does know about CONFIG_WCE,
>> QEMU should ignore the WCE feature's state. The guest will control the
>> cache mode solely using configuration space. This change makes Linux
>> do flushes correctly, but Linux will keep SeaBIOS's writethrough mode.
>
> This sounds fishy. The solutions happens to make recent Linux kernels do
> the right thing, but wouldn't drivers that don't know CONFIG_WCE still
> fall into the same trap?
No, drivers that don't know CONFIG_WCE will do the following:
1) -drive cache=writethrough case, WCE supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is not advertised.
The Linux virtio-blk driver tells the block layer to not send
cache flush commands, which is correct because they are useless.
VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is obviously not negotiated, and
virtio_blk_set_status confirms the disk in writethrough mode.
2) -drive cache=writeback case, WCE supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is advertised by the
device and negotiated by the driver. The Linux virtio-blk driver
recognizes that VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is negotiated and tells the block
layer to send cache flush commands. virtio_blk_set_status confirms
the disk in writeback mode.
3) -drive cache=writethrough case, WCE not supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is not advertised.
The virtio-blk driver doesn't do anything.
virtio_blk_set_status confirms the disk in writethrough mode.
4) -drive cache=writeback case, WCE not supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is advertised by the
device, but not negotiated by the driver.
The virtio-blk driver doesn't do anything.
virtio_blk_set_status places the disk in writethrough mode.
> I guess making a host feature flag dynamic was
> a bad idea to start with.
I disagree, it is very useful. The bug was unfortunate indeed, and
probably happened due to testing the two patches (CONFIG_WCE and
no-WCE-implies-writethrough) independently rather than together.
> Perhaps we should restrict the magic to disabling WCE in case the guest
> doesn't have VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, but never allow it to enable WCE even
> though we've already advertised that the host doesn't have WCE.
That's already what happens, because (thanks to the new
"bdrv_set_enable_write_cache(s->bs, s->original_wce);" at reset time)
VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is never exposed in writethrough mode.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-20 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 16:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Serious bugs in the handling of writeback caching Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-19 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] blockdev: do not default cache.no-flush to true Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-19 17:33 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-19 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: do not relay a previous driver's WCE configuration to the current Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-19 17:42 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-20 9:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-09-20 10:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-09-20 15:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-20 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Serious bugs in the handling of writeback caching Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523C234D.2020003@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).