From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Rorie Reyes <rreyes@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
akrowiak@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 3/4] hw/vfio/ap: Storing event information for an AP configuration change event
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 22:30:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5248c4f1-923e-4f6b-9c3f-ac24666fea04@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adca5063-786e-4c4e-90f8-dd378a2aa71c@linux.ibm.com>
On 6/3/25 20:01, Rorie Reyes wrote:
>
> On 6/3/25 10:21 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 6/3/25 14:58, Rorie Reyes wrote:
>>> Hey Cedric,
>>>
>>> You mentioned the following in my v9 patches
>>>
>>> "In that case, let's keep it simple (no mutex) and add a assert(bql_locked())
>>> statement where we think the bql should be protecting access to shared
>>> resources. "
>>>
>>> Does this still apply down bellow?
>>
>> Anthony replied :
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/ed2a2aa3-68a7-480c-a6a4-a8219af12d7b@linux.ibm.com/
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> C.
>>
> So we'll still use WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD?
If a lock is needed to protect the list, then ap_chsc_sei_nt0_have_event()
should lock/unlock too. WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() is just a pratical way to
do so.
Thanks,
C.
>>>
>>> On 5/26/25 4:40 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> On 5/23/25 18:03, Rorie Reyes wrote:
>>>>> These functions can be invoked by the function that handles interception
>>>>> of the CHSC SEI instruction for requests indicating the accessibility of
>>>>> one or more adjunct processors has changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rorie Reyes <rreyes@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> hw/vfio/ap.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> include/hw/s390x/ap-bridge.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ap.c b/hw/vfio/ap.c
>>>>> index fc435f5c5b..97a42a575a 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/vfio/ap.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/ap.c
>>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>>> * directory.
>>>>> */
>>>>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>>>>> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>>>> #include CONFIG_DEVICES /* CONFIG_IOMMUFD */
>>>>> #include <linux/vfio.h>
>>>>> @@ -48,6 +49,8 @@ typedef struct APConfigChgEvent {
>>>>> static QTAILQ_HEAD(, APConfigChgEvent) cfg_chg_events =
>>>>> QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(cfg_chg_events);
>>>>> +static QemuMutex cfg_chg_events_lock;
>>>>> +
>>>>> OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(VFIOAPDevice, VFIO_AP_DEVICE)
>>>>> static void vfio_ap_compute_needs_reset(VFIODevice *vdev)
>>>>> @@ -96,6 +99,49 @@ static void vfio_ap_cfg_chg_notifier_handler(void *opaque)
>>>>> }
>>>>> +int ap_chsc_sei_nt0_get_event(void *res)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + ChscSeiNt0Res *nt0_res = (ChscSeiNt0Res *)res;
>>>>> + APConfigChgEvent *cfg_chg_event;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qemu_mutex_lock(&cfg_chg_events_lock);
>>>>
>>>> please consider using WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
>>>>
>>> See note above about bql_locked
>>>>> + if (!ap_chsc_sei_nt0_have_event()) {
>>>>> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&cfg_chg_events_lock);
>>>>> + return EVENT_INFORMATION_NOT_STORED;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + cfg_chg_event = QTAILQ_FIRST(&cfg_chg_events);
>>>>> + QTAILQ_REMOVE(&cfg_chg_events, cfg_chg_event, next);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&cfg_chg_events_lock);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + memset(nt0_res, 0, sizeof(*nt0_res));
>>>>> + g_free(cfg_chg_event);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * If there are any AP configuration change events in the queue,
>>>>> + * indicate to the caller that there is pending event info in
>>>>> + * the response block
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (ap_chsc_sei_nt0_have_event()) {
>>>>> + nt0_res->flags |= PENDING_EVENT_INFO_BITMASK;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + nt0_res->length = sizeof(ChscSeiNt0Res);
>>>>> + nt0_res->code = NT0_RES_RESPONSE_CODE;
>>>>> + nt0_res->nt = NT0_RES_NT_DEFAULT;
>>>>> + nt0_res->rs = NT0_RES_RS_AP_CHANGE;
>>>>> + nt0_res->cc = NT0_RES_CC_AP_CHANGE;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return EVENT_INFORMATION_STORED;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +bool ap_chsc_sei_nt0_have_event(void)
>>>>
>>>> hmm, no locking ?
>>>>
>>> See not above for bql_locked
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return !QTAILQ_EMPTY(&cfg_chg_events);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static bool vfio_ap_register_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev,
>>>>> unsigned int irq, Error **errp)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -192,6 +238,13 @@ static void vfio_ap_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>>>> VFIOAPDevice *vapdev = VFIO_AP_DEVICE(dev);
>>>>> VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vapdev->vdev;
>>>>> + static bool lock_initialized;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!lock_initialized) {
>>>>> + qemu_mutex_init(&cfg_chg_events_lock);
>>>>> + lock_initialized = true;
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> this could be replaced with a constructor routine. See hyperv.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> C.
>>>>
>>> Noted
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> if (!vfio_device_get_name(vbasedev, errp)) {
>>>>> return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/ap-bridge.h b/include/hw/s390x/ap-bridge.h
>>>>> index 470e439a98..7efc52928d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/hw/s390x/ap-bridge.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/ap-bridge.h
>>>>> @@ -16,4 +16,43 @@
>>>>> void s390_init_ap(void);
>>>>> +typedef struct ChscSeiNt0Res {
>>>>> + uint16_t length;
>>>>> + uint16_t code;
>>>>> + uint8_t reserved1;
>>>>> + uint16_t reserved2;
>>>>> + uint8_t nt;
>>>>> +#define PENDING_EVENT_INFO_BITMASK 0x80;
>>>>> + uint8_t flags;
>>>>> + uint8_t reserved3;
>>>>> + uint8_t rs;
>>>>> + uint8_t cc;
>>>>> +} QEMU_PACKED ChscSeiNt0Res;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define NT0_RES_RESPONSE_CODE 1
>>>>> +#define NT0_RES_NT_DEFAULT 0
>>>>> +#define NT0_RES_RS_AP_CHANGE 5
>>>>> +#define NT0_RES_CC_AP_CHANGE 3
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define EVENT_INFORMATION_NOT_STORED 1
>>>>> +#define EVENT_INFORMATION_STORED 0
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * ap_chsc_sei_nt0_get_event - Retrieve the next pending AP config
>>>>> + * change event
>>>>> + * @res: Pointer to a ChscSeiNt0Res struct to be filled with event
>>>>> + * data
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This function checks for any pending AP config change events and,
>>>>> + * if present, populates the provided response structure with the
>>>>> + * appropriate SEI NT0 fields.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Return:
>>>>> + * EVENT_INFORMATION_STORED - An event was available and written to @res
>>>>> + * EVENT_INFORMATION_NOT_STORED - No event was available
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +int ap_chsc_sei_nt0_get_event(void *res);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +bool ap_chsc_sei_nt0_have_event(void);
>>>>> +> #endif
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-03 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 16:03 [RFC PATCH v11 0/4] Report vfio-ap configuration changes Rorie Reyes
2025-05-23 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH v11 1/4] hw/vfio/ap: notification handler for AP config changed event Rorie Reyes
2025-05-23 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH v11 2/4] hw/vfio/ap: store object indicating AP config changed in a queue Rorie Reyes
2025-05-23 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH v11 3/4] hw/vfio/ap: Storing event information for an AP configuration change event Rorie Reyes
2025-05-26 8:40 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-06-03 12:58 ` Rorie Reyes
2025-06-03 14:21 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-06-03 18:01 ` Rorie Reyes
2025-06-03 20:30 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2025-06-04 13:47 ` Anthony Krowiak
2025-06-05 17:57 ` Rorie Reyes
2025-06-06 11:48 ` Anthony Krowiak
2025-06-06 13:01 ` Rorie Reyes
2025-05-23 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH v11 4/4] s390: implementing CHSC SEI for AP config change Rorie Reyes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5248c4f1-923e-4f6b-9c3f-ac24666fea04@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rreyes@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).