qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Ottlik <ottlik@fzi.de>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] Do not set SO_REUSEADDR on Windows
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:11:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524A83A8.3020909@fzi.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5240190E.5050204@fzi.de>

On 23.09.2013 12:33, Sebastian Ottlik wrote:
> On 18.09.2013 18:58, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 16.09.2013 17:10, schrieb Sebastian Ottlik:
>>> On 16.09.2013 16:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> Il 16/09/2013 16:23, Sebastian Ottlik ha scritto:
>>>>> - Added the silent flag to socket_set_fast_reuse controlling error
>>>>> reporting
>>>>>     One location where SO_REUSEADDR was set would report errors if
>>>>> setting the
>>>>>     option failed. Keeping the reporting code there would be somewhat
>>>>> unclean, so
>>>>>     I moved it to socket_set_fast_reuse. A side effect of this was
>>>>> that the error
>>>>>     reporting was added for all locations that now use
>>>>> socket_set_fast_reuse. Here
>>>>>     a new flag is added to control error reporting, which means this
>>>>> patchset
>>>>>     won't change QEMU behaviour (except for not setting SO_REUSEADDR
>>>>> on Windows).
>>>> Is there actually a case where setting SO_REUSEADDR could fail?
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>> Yes, but its very unlikely. E.g. the first parameter is not a valid
>>> socket.
>>>
>> If failures only happen when something is very wrong (like an invalid
>> socket id),
>> an assertion might be better, and we could remove the 'silent' 
>> parameter.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
> IMO for debug builds this is a good idea. However, in production use 
> it is probably preferable to keep QEMU running, as a failure won't be 
> too critical. From a quick grep it looks like NDEBUG is not set so 
> assertions wont be removed for non-debug builds. I don't feel 
> acquainted enough with the source code to decide about this kind of 
> change in functionality, which is why I was waiting so long to reply.
ping

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-01  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-16 14:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] Do not set SO_REUSEADDR on Windows Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-16 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/5] util: add socket_set_fast_reuse function which will replace setting SO_REUSEADDR Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-16 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/5] gdbstub: call socket_set_fast_reuse instead of " Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-16 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/5] net: " Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-16 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/5] slirp: " Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-16 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 5/5] util: " Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-16 14:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] Do not set SO_REUSEADDR on Windows Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-16 15:10   ` Sebastian Ottlik
2013-09-18 16:58     ` Stefan Weil
2013-09-23 10:33       ` Sebastian Ottlik
2013-10-01  8:11         ` Sebastian Ottlik [this message]
2013-10-01 16:44           ` Stefan Weil
2013-09-18 12:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524A83A8.3020909@fzi.de \
    --to=ottlik@fzi.de \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).