From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51455) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRkpE-0000PP-1i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:28:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRkp5-0007PY-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:28:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]:32823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRkp5-0007PT-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:28:15 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x13so5923619ief.17 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <524D8D09.3050808@twiddle.net> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:28:09 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <524D6838.5080607@linaro.org> <524D807D.4070205@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: Implement ARMv8 VSEL instruction. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Will Newton Cc: QEMU Developers , Patch Tracking On 10/03/2013 08:10 AM, Will Newton wrote: > No, thanks for picking that up. I was wondering if that was valid and > the code seemed to work. What's the best way to work around the > problem? Just extend everything up to 64bits? For the simple conditions, yes. For the more complex ones, you might want to do the computation in 32-bit and extend the result. r~