From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSoqs-0006Xv-FB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 09:58:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSoqm-00043U-6I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 09:58:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]:39678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSoql-00043K-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 09:58:24 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp2so6027499pbb.28 for ; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 06:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52516C4A.6080508@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:57:30 +0800 From: Zhang Haoyu MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130117163740.7157.55600.malonedeb@gac.canonical.com> <20130926203354.30826.10562.malone@soybean.canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20130926203354.30826.10562.malone@soybean.canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1100843] Re: Live Migration Causes Performance Issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bug 1100843 <1100843@bugs.launchpad.net>, gleb@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com Cc: qemu-devel >>>From my testing this has been fixed in the saucy version (1.5.0) of qemu. It is fixed by this patch: >f1c72795af573b24a7da5eb52375c9aba8a37972 > >However later in the history this commit was reverted, and again broke this. The other commit that fixes this is: >211ea74022f51164a7729030b28eec90b6c99a08 > See below post,please. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-08/msg05062.html Thanks, Zhang Haoyu >So 211ea740 needs to be backported to P/Q/R to fix this issue. I have a v1 packages of a precise backport here, I've confirmed performance differences between savevm/loadvm cycles: >http://people.canonical.com/~arges/lp1100843/precise/ > >** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu) > >** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Precise) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > >** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > >** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Raring) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > >** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Saucy) > Importance: High > Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) > Status: In Progress > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Precise) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris J Arges (arges) > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris J Arges (arges) > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Raring) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris J Arges (arges) > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Precise) > Importance: Undecided => High > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal) > Importance: Undecided => High > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Raring) > Importance: Undecided => High > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Saucy) > Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) => (unassigned) > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Saucy) > Status: In Progress => Fix Released > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Raring) > Status: New => Triaged > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal) > Status: New => Triaged > >** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Precise) > Status: New => In Progress