From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTBM3-0005zh-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTBLs-0001y5-TM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:43479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTBLs-0001xY-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:00 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so7212645pdj.15 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 06:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5252BE58.8020700@ozlabs.ru> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:59:52 +1100 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1376606111-3518-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1376606111-3518-2-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <522E9CC6.8030809@ozlabs.ru> <523712A0.3060403@ozlabs.ru> <5242A677.9090809@ozlabs.ru> <5249BB17.60800@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5249BB17.60800@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] target-ppc: Fill in OpenFirmware names for some PowerPCCPU families List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: open@suse.de, "list@suse.de:PowerPC" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , Prerna Saxena , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/01/2013 03:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 09/25/2013 11:01 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 09/17/2013 12:16 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> On 08/16/2013 08:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>>>> Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. >>>>> Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the >>>>> lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber >>>> >>>> Out of curiosity - is anything going to happen to this series? Is it >>>> awaiting for someone's review? Just asking as it is quite old and nobody >>>> seems to care :) >>> Ping, anyone? Not sure if any of my mails even reaches maillists :-/ >> Ping? >> >> It conflicts with "[PATCH] pseries: Fix loading of little endian kernels" >> posted today. It would be great to have either this series or the new patch >> upstream... > > Andreas is going to rework it, yes :). Wheeeen? Not complaining or anything, just asking :) -- Alexey