From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VToQb-0002P1-D7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:43:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VToQS-0007Du-Sn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:43:29 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22b]:40074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VToQS-0007Dm-LV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:43:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n15so187060ead.16 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <52550912.3000402@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 09:43:14 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20131008004126.773017235@amt.cnet> <874n8sp68n.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <5253BC12.90105@redhat.com> <20131008220329.GB16625@amt.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20131008220329.GB16625@amt.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/2] force -mem-path RAM allocation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 09/10/2013 00:03, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto: > It would be important for the new option to be backportable > independently. Therefore mixing it with -numa is not an option. Why is it important to backport it independently? In any case you need management support for the new option. Paolo