From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VU1IP-0004Qx-Mi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VU1IF-00005R-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:27:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::231]:54826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VU1IE-00005F-Ue for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:27:43 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d41so708414eek.22 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5255CA49.4060309@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:27:37 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20131008004126.773017235@amt.cnet> <874n8sp68n.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <5253BC12.90105@redhat.com> <20131008220329.GB16625@amt.cnet> <87r4bv7yjl.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20131009200517.GB16670@amt.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20131009200517.GB16670@amt.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/2] force -mem-path RAM allocation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 09/10/2013 22:05, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto: >>> > > Can the new option format for memory be created incrementally on >>> > > top of -mem-path-force? (agree its a good thing, it avoids proliferation >>> > > of new options). >> > >> > If you do it on top, it won't avoid proliferation, or am I missing >> > something? > Right. But in fact, the new option is not necessary. > > So please consider only patch 2 for inclusion. Do you mean only patch 1? Paolo